Unit5Disc1QDA Correlation Versus Causation
If correlation does not imply causation, what does it imply? Are there ever any circumstances when a correlation can be interpreted as evidence for a causal connection between two variables? If yes, what circumstances? Required Readings
Use your Warner text, Applied Statistics: From Bivariate Through Multivariate Techniques, to complete the following: Read Chapter 7, “Bivariate Pearson Correlation,” pages 261–314. This chapter addresses the following topics: Assumptions of Pearson’s r. Preliminary data screening for Pearson’s r. Statistical significance tests for Pearson’s r. Factors influencing the magnitude and sign of Pearson’s r. Effect-size indexes. Interpretation of Pearson’s r values. Read Chapter 8, “Alternative Correlation Coefficients,” pages 315–343. This chapter addresses the following topics: Correlations for rank or ordinal scores. Correlations for true dichotomies. Correlations for artificial dichotomies. Chi-square test of association.
Jia, Y., Konold, T. R., & Cornell, D. (2015). Authoritative school climate and high school dropout rates. School Psychology Quarterly. doi:10.1037/spq0000139
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2001). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science, 12(5), 353–359.
Unit5Disc2QDA Interpreting Correlations
A meta-analysis (Anderson & Bushman, 2001) reported that the average correlation between time spent playing video games ( X) and engaging in aggressive behavior ( Y) in a set of 21 well-controlled experimental studies was .19. This correlation was judged to be statistically significant. In your own words, what can you say about the nature of the relationship?
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount